Crypto's Chevron contradiction ⚖️

Why celebrating the overturning of Chevron is shortsighted.

GM, Joanna here.

Here’s a controversial view for ya: Crypto is shortsighted in celebrating the Supreme Court’s momentous decision to overturn Chevron.

The industry talks a big game about financial inclusion, yet is hailing a decision that harms Americans. 

Before we get into why, let’s recap: 

  • The Supreme Court on Friday ruled 6-3 to overturn a guideline known as “Chevron deference.” The case involved two herring fishing fleet operators in a spat with their regulator.

  • The Chevron doctrine states that where the law is vague, courts should defer to regulators’ understanding of it, as they know their own turf best. 

  • Scotus’s decision — as I reported back in January — will erode regulators’ power to weigh in where the law is unclear.

Why is crypto celebrating?

Well, the industry wants any weapon that could take down the mighty Securities and Exchange Commission. 

Fair enough.

The markets watchdog has, under Chair Gary Gensler, waged a crackdown against the industry via the courts. 

But Chevron’s overturning has far wider implications.

For three decades, Chevron has protected Americans against corporate selfishness. 

It’s the wall corporate behemoths crashed into when trying to erode workplace safety, environmental protections, food safety practices, and more. 

Hence why conservatives and big business have long wanted rid of it. 

The majority ultraconservative Supreme Court doesn’t care about small-time herring fishing fleets — those cases were a convenient proxy. 

It’s telling, for example, that the court agreed to hear only the bits of the case to do with Chevron.

It’s also telling that the legal teams for the fishing fleets — those apparent underdogs — were funded by petrochemicals billionaire Charles Koch. 

If you still need proof that the US’ highest court is closer than ever to its corporate cronies, look no further than a separate ruling last week.

On Wednesday the court effectively legalised the kinds of gifts from billionaires justices have been accused of accepting.  

Libertarians argue that Chevron’s overturning means out-of-control agencies can no longer regulate at will. 

Don’t get me wrong — the administrative state needs checks and balances.

But Chevron was never a blunt instrument in the hands of regulators — the views of energy giant Chevron, for example, prevailed in the very 1984 case after which the doctrine is named.

There’s nothing libertarian about what legal experts say will result from overturning the doctrine.

The consequences include drawn-out court cases, and giving unelected judges legislative power and corporations the chance to shop around for biassed judges. 

Tearing it up will also enable non-expert judges to rule on issues they know nothing about. 

So the Supreme Court’s decision is bad for ordinary Americans. 

That should worry crypto companies that market themselves as empowering retail investors. 

Trading Bitcoin can’t save a population whose access to clean water and air, safe working environments, and non-toxic food is being chipped away. 

Crypto didn’t need Chevron overturned — it’s going to get everything it wants anyway.

Gensler will be gone soon, and Congress is warming to the industry.

Crypto’s celebration of policies that harm American consumers reveals where the industry’s allegiances now lie — firmly with the establishment. 

Reach out to joanna@dlnews.com.

ICYMI

  • Binance must face the bulk of the SEC’s lawsuit against it. In a 90-page decision, Judge Amy Berman Jackson said the SEC plausibly alleges that the exchange and its US entity were engaged in unregistered offers and sales of securities.

  • The SEC sued Metamask developer Consensys for alleged violations of securities laws.

  • The US Treasury has finalised its broker rules that compel crypto exchanges to report trades to the US tax authority.

Story of the Week

In a milestone for crypto, the EU’s Markets in Crypto-Assets regulation’s stablecoin rules went live on Sunday. Now token issuers and trading platforms must adjust to licensing and reserve requirements, and delist tokens that don’t comply. Inbar Preiss has this handy rundown.

Post of the Week

Americans reacted to a disastrous presidential debate. While Republican pick Donald Trump and opponent US president Joe Biden have both warmed to crypto of late, the topic didn’t come up during the debate.

Comment of the Week

‘There should be no misunderstanding: Efforts in the United States and abroad are little more than a bid to solidify government control over money and payments,’ writes Nicholas Anthony, a policy analyst at the libertarian Cato Institute think tank, in a new book on central bank digital currencies.

DL News is an independent news organisation that provides original, in-depth reporting on the largely misunderstood world of cryptocurrency and decentralised finance. From original stories to investigations, our journalism is accurate, honest and responsible.

Forwarded by a friend? subscribe here.